The controversy over the marbles is largely a matter of Greek politics.

Having built this new museum for the Elgin Marbles, the Greeks have managed to rustle up one or two British journalists credulous or naïve enough to write articles calling for their return. But if anyone thinks the building is ever going to house anything other than the plaster casts that are on display there now, they are hopelessly out of touch with reality. There is virtually no chance that the director or trustees of the British Museum, now or in the future, will comply with this outlandish demand.

Let’s review the facts. Lord Elgin paid the enormous sum of £39,000 to acquire the marbles, and was careful to obtain documents from the Turkish Government approving their removal from Greece, which had then been part of the Ottoman Empire for 350 years. Since Parliament legally purchased the marbles from Lord Elgin in 1816, the British Museum’s title to them is unassailable. The Greeks know this perfectly well – otherwise, instead of pulling this PR stunt, they would be suing Britain in the European courts.

What those calling for the return of the marbles can’t seem to get through their heads is that, even if it wished to, the British Government cannot simply transfer their ownership to another European state. Objects in our national museums belong in law not to parliament but to their trustees. This ensures that no government can sell works from our museums to raise revenue (as happened in Russia in the 1920s), or give them away for short- term political advantage. Were the trustees of the British Museum to comply with the Greek proposal, they would be in breach of their obligation to use the objects in their care for maximum public benefit, and could therefore expect a lawsuit of their own from members of the public, such as me, compelling them to fulfil the trust that was placed in them when they were appointed.

So here are a few ideas for the Greeks: first, why not erect a statue of Lord Elgin near the Parthenon to express their nation’s gratitude to him for saving the marbles? After the Ottoman conquest of Athens in 1458, the Turks used the Parthenon as a mosque and then as a powder magazine. In 1687, when the building took a direct hit from a Venetian cannon, most of its interior walls were destroyed, bringing much of the frieze down with them. By the time Lord Elgin became ambassador to Istanbul in 1798, the Parthenon was a ruin. Turkish soldiers used the marbles for target practice, and the locals burned statues to make lime for the mortar to build their houses. His purchase of the marbles was motivated by the real risk to their survival.

Second, instead of whining about events that happened more than two centuries ago, perhaps the Greek ambassador should formally thank Britain for displaying the marbles in those beautiful galleries at the British Museum, where 4.6 million visitors a year from all over the world can view them free of charge.

Of course that won’t happen, because the “controversy” over the marbles is largely a matter of Greek politics. Remember that until very recently, it had not seriously occurred to anyone that they should be given back to Greece. For most of the 19th and 20th centuries, the defining element in Greek identity was membership in the Greek Orthodox Church. When in the 1980s the socialist minister of culture Melina Mercouri noisily campaigned for the return of the marbles, the actress skilfully turned them into a symbol of Greek identity. Since her time, no Greek politician has ever lost a vote echoing her demand. But the marbles no more “belong” to Greece than do the plays of Euripides.

Let the new museum stand as a monument to the futility of cultural nationalism — in this case trying to claim back something that by now belongs to the whole world.

Comments from BCRPM members:

The credulous or naïve journalists that Richard Dorment castigates - they include more than one from his own paper - are people who (unlike him, apparently) realised that, for a mature judgment of this issue, it was essential to see the New Acropolis Museum for oneself. They at least know what can be seen there other than the plaster casts that are on display - for example, the world�s finest collection of pre-Classical Greek sculpture; or, better still, the West Frieze of the Parthenon, and the smaller pieces from the North, South and East, that Elgin left behind, living proof that the Marbles would have survived without Elgin�s intervention; or even some tell-tale traces of the vandalism of Elgin's agents in detaching the slabs from the building and sawing them in two. Dorment's whole paragraph beginning 'Let's review the facts' would have better started with 'Let's murder the facts'; while its concluding sneer about litigation in the courts may yet prove a hostage to fortune. Anthony Snodgrass

Having seen the display in Athens and then revisited the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum, there is no doubt (in my mind) where these sculptures look best and more importantly - where they make more sense. Am really sorry that Richard Dorment has written such a poor article and there are some critical errors in his reporting too. I wonder, if the positive features written by other journalists were naivety or better judgement and understanding. Perhaps Richard Dorment is the only journalist able to support the British Museum and its Trustees in its dated approach to the reunification of a peerless work of art. So much more would be gained if the British Museum returned these sculptures to Greece and indeed more visitors would make time to visit the British Museum. Marlen Taffarello

|  Return   |